Co-funded by:
7th framework programme of the European Commission, DG MOVE


http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm
http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home_en.html

CO2 based annual vehicle circulation tax (CO2 taxation)

FACT SHEET NO.: Cat-No.2 / Subcat-No.2.2-1


General Information

Title

FACT SHEET NO.: Cat-No.2 / Subcat-No.2.2-1

Category

2. Taxation

Subcategory

2.2 Transport taxation

Transport policy measure (TPM)

CO2 based annual vehicle circulation tax (CO2 taxation)

Description of TPM

Car taxation is a powerful instrument to influence the purchase decisions of consumers. Taxes can be differentiated to support the market introduction of fuel efficient and low CO2 emitting cars. This could greatly facilitate the efforts of car manufacturers to meet their obligations by bringing such vehicles to the market. Of the various taxation instruments available to the policy maker, the present assessment focused on the use of taxes to encourage the purchase and use of low emission vehicles, i.e. taxes on registration and annual circulation Some countries modernized their circulation tax system with CO2 base in order to reduce GHG emission. The European Community's objective is to reduce CO2 emission to 120 g/km on average of the new car fleet. [3]

Implementation examples

Germany: Vehicles first registered before June 30, 2009 are taxed according to engine displacement and national/European emission class, whereas vehicles which were registered after that date are taxed solely based on CO2 emission in grams per km (g CO2/km).
France: Since 2006 the tax is levied according to CO2 emissions ranging from 2 euros per gramme to 19 euros per gramme.
Belgium: Passenger cars pay a registration fee based on the cylinder content and KW output (degressive towards 2014 (66% in 2012, 33% in 2013, 0% in 2014) and environmental criteria such as CO2 gr/km output (increasingly towards 2014). The more CO2 gr/km the car produces, the higher the fee will be.

Objectives of TPM

Vehicle taxes can significantly determine the composition of the car fleet [2], therefore CO2 based circulation taxes could effectively raise the market share of low-carbon vehicles. IN addition to this:- Providing for a high level of environmental protection in the European Union- Reducing local air pollution emission- Reducing the climate change impacts and improving the fuel efficiency of light-dutyroad vehicles

Choice of transport mode / Multimodality

Origin and/or destination of trip

Trip frequency

Choice of route

Timing (day, hour)

Occupancy rate / Loading factor

Energy efficiency / Energy usage

Lower CO2 emission usually imply lower fuel consumpiton, due to more efficient engines

Main source

[1] Hill, N. et al (2012): EU Transport GHG: Routes to 2050 II
[2] Vance, C., Mehlin, M. (2009): Tax Policy and CO2 Emissions - An Econometric Analysis of the German Automobile Market. Ruhr Economic Papers #89, Feb. 2009
[3] European Commission (2007): Results of the review of the Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles Impact Assessment. Brussels.

Traffic Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Travel or transport time

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Risk of congestion

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Vehicle mileage

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Service and comfort

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

Higher costs of car ownership could lead to decreased vehicle mileage, while slow modes and ppublic transport increases. [3]

Quantification of impacts


Economic Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Transport costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Private income / commercial turn over

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Revenues in the transport sector

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sectoral competitiveness

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Spatial competitiveness

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Housing expenditures

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Insurance costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Health service costs

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Public authorities & adm. burdens on businesses

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Public income (e.g.: taxes, charges)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Third countries and international relations

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

Impact depends on the residents behaviour, but in principal, transport costs for car users increase, while public bodies benefit. [3]

Quantification of impacts


Social Impacts
Environmental Impacts

Passengers 

         

Transport operators 

           

Unassigned 

         

Air pollutants

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Noise emissions

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Visual quality of the landscape

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Land use

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Climate

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Renewable or non-renewable resources

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Overall impacts on social groups

Implementation phase

Operation phase

Summary / comments concerning the main impacts

GHG emission can be reduced significantly. Replacing high-performance cars with low-emission ones reduces fuel consumption.
Residents within urban areas an near motorways will benefit most from the reduced air pollutants (maybe noise emissions if more electric vehicles will be used). However, electric vehicles and other chargeable passengers cars will only lead to reduced GHG on a global scale if there are charged with renewable resources (wind, solar, etc). Otherwise, lifetime emissions will stay the same and GHG sources will be replaced from cars to power plants [3].

Quantification of impacts


0 Comments

Write a comment for this page

Response to:  Direct response to the article